Your donations pay for the CIH Forum hosting and software.
$0
$100
Red line = monthly cost of CIH
August Donors: Big Momma, Anonymous, Your Name Here
Please help the CIH Forums by disabling AdBlock Plus on this page.
Forum Home Forum Home :: The Message Board :: Television Related Rants
  Active Topics Active Topics
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

An Interesting Article

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Share on Facebook Share  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
MTVsux View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
  Quote MTVsux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: An Interesting Article
    Posted: 04 Nov 2009 at 8:27pm
  
Originally posted by Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/29/AR2009102904501_pf.html
The ABCs of TLC, GSN and A& E: Niche networks skew younger to avoid ending up MIA

By Lisa de Moraes
Friday, October 30, 2009

Starting Friday, the Weather Channel will interrupt its coverage of whatever tsunami, blizzard, hurricane or tornado is making life a perfect hell for folks in some neck of the world to bring you . . . an old movie.

And in January, GSN will divert its unending stream of vintage and new game shows to bring you the newest iteration of the Carnie Wilson Is Trying to Lose Weight Again reality series.

It's the latest round of highly targeted niche networks looking to beef up -- or young up -- their audience by veering off point. It seems to be a rite of passage played out over and over again.

Remember when the letters TLC stood for The Learning Channel and the network brought you educational and informational programming as opposed to Jon and Kate's divorce-o-rama? Remember when A&E stood for Arts & Entertainment and competed with PBS for sumptuous British-made crunchy-gravel period dramas like "Vanity Fair" and "Horatio Hornblower"? Or when AMC stood for American Movie Classics and aired movies that were actually "classic" and not cut up with commercial breaks? When Syfy was Sci Fi? When MTV meant Music Television and was the destination for medicated viewing of rock videos? Good times.

Sadly, those networks' original identities are long gone and they've become part of the Great Cable Gobbledygook, bringing us a steady stream of inexpensive reality series, reruns of broadcast TV series, old flicks, more reality series, an original scripted program or two, and did we mention reality series?

"Carnie's relatable life story is a perfect fit with our viewers, who are eager to discover the person behind the personality," Kelly Goode, GSN's senior VP of programming, said when it made the announcement -- though we can't imagine what's left to "discover" about a chick who has already put pretty much everything about herself out there, up to and including a Web stream of her gastric bypass surgery in 1999 -- the first time she tried to lose weight for our entertainment. Wilson hosts GSN's "The Newlywed Game."

"Adding films to our Friday night lineup is a great way for us to further demonstrate how weather is an all-encompassing part of our lives that entertains and inspires us," Geoffrey Darby, the Weather Channel's executive VP of programming, said when that network recently made public its movie plan, starting with "The Perfect Storm" and also including "March of the Penguins" and "Deep Blue Sea."

If you could swallow that horseradish, you had no problem when he said:

"From the Nor'easter in 'The Perfect Storm' to the tornado that takes Dorothy to Oz, weather has a long history as a film star."

Darby knew better than to try to explain how the Stephen King horror flick "Misery" fit into the whole "weather" brand -- the network has scheduled it for Friday the 13th (of November). He left it to a publicist to tell the New York Times that the flick featured "a blinding snowstorm, so the weather plays an important role in the plot, even if it's not the main character."

Even so, some reporters weren't buying this hooey, including trade publication TV Week, whose managing editor Chuck Ross wondered: If "Misery" passed the smell test, did that mean the Weather Channel would soon add "Animal House" to its movie repertoire because "the high jinks really heat up whenever John Belushi is on the screen?"

* * *

When a network stops referring to itself by its full title and starts using only its abbreviation, that's usually a sign changes are ahead. GSN, for instance, used to stand for Game Show Network. In its Carnie Wilson is Going to Lose Weight on TV Again announcement, it was all GSN this and GSN that.

Another sign that change is in store is when the head of programming tells The TV Column:

"I think the brand, which we see as 'competition entertainment,' allows for a lot of flexibility," Goode opined. The audience gives you permission to put on different things within your brand. . . . I recently thought of it like a menu in an Italian restaurant that will be the regular menu and always mixing in a variety or specials."

(In fairness, it's not the first time GSN has done a reality series about one of its hosts. It ordered six episodes of "Chuck Woolery: Naturally Stoned" back in '03 when he was hosting its game show "Lingo" -- and the network was still calling itself the Game Show Network.)

Though many cable networks have tried to change their stripes, the Mother of all Overhauls was that of the Network Formerly Known as Arts & Entertainment.

"Five years ago we had a big median-age issue," A&E President and General Manager Bob DeBitetto told us. "The median age of the network was about 62 years old. With the possible exception of the Hallmark Channel, it was the oldest-skewing cable network -- period. That's a problem, regrettably. It's a challenge for those of us that are in the advertiser-supported industry because . . . ad agencies target demographic delivery."

"Target demographic delivery" is a politically correct way of saying "discriminate on the basis of age" -- advertisers pay networks far less if they attract older viewers.

"We decided at some risk to begin to transform our programming approach, to introduce A&E to an entirely new generation of viewers," DeBitetto explained.

Good bye, "Horatio Hornblower"; hello "Growing up Gotti."

With a prime-time lineup that includes rehab reality series "Intervention" on Mondays, a Philadelphia Parking Authority reality series called "Parking Wars" on Tuesdays, Duane Chapman's reality series "Dog the Bounty Hunter" all night Wednesday, crime investigation reality series "The First 48" on Thursdays and reruns of CBS's "Criminal Minds" on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, the median age of the A&E audience now hovers in the mid-40s.

"I'm proud to say A&E will be this year . . . Number 6 in 18-to-49-year-olds" among all cable networks, DeBitetto said.

The Network Formerly Known as the Learning Channel also gets high marks for its brand overhaul among industry pundits, who cite its innovation in creating and promoting its freakish reality series -- including "Toddlers & Tiaras," about baby beauty queens and their frightening parents; and "Say Yes to the Dress," a makeover series; and the self-explanatory "I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant."

And, of course, the whole Aren't You Glad You're Not Jon or Kate saga. Yes, TLC has a real brand now. It has nothing to do with learning.

Back to Top
shadow View Drop Down
Honor Roll
Honor Roll
Avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4971
  Quote shadow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Nov 2009 at 8:13pm
AAAAAARRRRRRGGGH!
Instead of worrying about the target aged advertising losing money, maybe focus on keeping your shows less suckish and then maybe you can demand a better ad dollar.

These niche networks worked because they were unique to the industry.
Right out of the gate the networks knew who their target was.  The ads were geared towards them and it created a sort of ecosystem that worked.  Now these greedy monkeys want to expand that, thus changing the network from being unique to being more like the norm.  All networks seem to be blending into a grey blob of programs that have no focus.

I really believe in my cold heart that the death of creativity in television today lands squarely on the shoulders of those who go the cheap route and pump out useless reality tv.  Once the idea of low budget, high hype=big $$$, it all fell apart.  If every reality shows disappeared today, what would be left?

I really enjoyed having a couple of hundred channels that catered to small groups available to me.  It actually broadened my interests and gave me true entertainment.  Now it seems like we slid backwards and the channels are all the same leaving us to hunt and peck our way through the menu hoping to find something.  It's really sad because many good shows that may have thrived, now are lost because we have no way of connecting it to a particular network.

I cannot say just how many shows I have made mental notes to watch only to forget them or not be able to find them because I scanned for thirty minutes and had no way to find them.  At least if it were sitcom, I would start in the big three networks, or if it were about a giant power plant, I would go to TLC or SCI channel, now it is hit or miss randomness.

Niche networking made life much easier.  Reality tv has become a cable virus that consumes every channel and lowers the overall quality of programming that surrounds it.
Honestly, if there were a REALITY NETWORK, it would seriously need like three channels just to show them all.  Perhaps this is why I now look online for shows that interest me before looking on tv.

As I have said in the past, we should do away with all networks now and have an a la carte program menu.  We choose what and when to watch.  The cream rises, and the crud sinks.  I am seeing glimpses of this on Cox cable where the Prime time on demand is a growing trend.  I can see the current shows I like for free on demand and not have to wade through the subtufuge.

<\this concludes my rant>
Back to Top
Thor View Drop Down
Revolutionary
Revolutionary
Avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22876
  Quote Thor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Nov 2009 at 1:02am
Good article, MTVsux.
 
Good commentary, Shadow.
 
I was just noting last night, how there used to be a block of about 10 channels in the upper 200s (of Comcast) that I used to go to fer sum larnin'.  Now, there are maybe 4.
 
Back to Top
Tiz View Drop Down
Revolutionary
Revolutionary
Avatar
I donated!

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Location: Virginia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8147
  Quote Tiz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Nov 2009 at 10:00pm
I'd be willing to bet cable companies would be surprised at how many people would go for a la carte tier. They could continue to offer 200+ channels but offer say, a 20-50 channel la cart option.
Digital Basic
Digital Premium
Digital a la carte....... pick your 50 channels Thumbs%20Up
 
How hard can it be?
Back to Top
FaithSF View Drop Down
Revolutionary
Revolutionary
Avatar
I donated!

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4535
  Quote FaithSF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 6:55am
I couldn't figure out where else to put this, but the announcer for all of Bravo's show ads sound like the guy is yelling AND talking through a megaphone.  Annoying!
You're just jealous 'cause the voices only talk to me--and Yutolia!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.